In 2025, are we a country, a confederation of states, or geographic home base for corporations

Reading the following HSNewsWire article [link below] on supply chains and the language differences between the private sector vs government, i am reminded of the 1976 movie Network.

https://www.homelandsecuritynewswire.com/dr20250122-securing-supply-chain-resilience-requires-a-common-vocabulary-and-vision?page=0,1

Network. Paddy Chayefsky. Big 70s all-star cast.

There’s a great soliloquy – no not Peter Finch/Howard Beale’s “I’m mad as hell and i’m not going to take it anymore…” The one i often think of is the Ned Beaty/network CEO:

“‘ You have meddled with the primal forces of nature, Mr. Beale, and I won’t have it!! Is that clear?! You think you’ve merely stopped a business deal. That is not the case. The Arabs have taken billions of dollars out of this country, and now they must put it back! It is ebb and flow, tidal gravity! It is ecological balance!

You are an old man who thinks in terms of nations and peoples. There are no nations. There are no peoples. There are no Russians. There are no Arabs. There are no third worlds. There is no West.

There is only one holistic system of systems, one vast and immane, interwoven, interacting, multivariate, multi-national dominion of dollars. Petro-dollars, electro-dollars, multi-dollars, Reichmarks, Yen, Rubles, Pounds, and Shekels. It is the international system of currency which determines the totality of life on this planet.

That is the natural order of things today. That is the atomic and subatomic and galactic structure of things today! And YOU have meddled with the primal forces of nature, and YOU WILL ATONE! Am I getting through to you, Mr. Beale?

You get up on your little twenty-one inch screen and howl about America and democracy. There is no America. There is no democracy. There is only IBM and ITT and AT&T and DuPont, Dow, Union Carbide, and Exxon. Those are the nations of the world today.

What do you think the Russians talk about in their councils of state — Karl Marx? They get out their linear programming charts, statistical decision theories, minimax solutions, and compute the price-cost probabilities of their transactions and investments, just like we do.

We no longer live in a world of nations and ideologies, Mr. Beale. The world is a college of corporations, inexorably determined by the immutable bylaws of business. The world is a business, Mr. Beale. It has been since man crawled out of the slime.

And our children will live, Mr. Beale, to see that perfect world in which there’s no war or famine, oppression or brutality — one vast and e****enical holding company, for whom all men will work to serve a common profit, in which all men will hold a share of stock, all necessities provided, all anxieties tranquilized, all boredom amused.

Green Bay Packers: “‘The People’s Team”‘

For decades I’ve cringed whenever I heard the Dallas Cowboys referred to as “America’s Team”. For decades I swerved between suffering and schadenfreude over the NFL’s Washington R@$#… / WFT/Commanders… under their billionaire owners.

But my growing cynicism has expanded across all U.S. professional sports (NFL, MLB, NHL, and the NCAA ) are reaching a crescendo.  My biggest cringes are saved for the hypocrisy / of the leagues and their owners who, on one hand refer to their teams as “part of the social fabric” of their community, while at another time holding these same communities (and their state governments…) hostage to threats of relocation to another community if their demands for public funding for newer, bigger, more profitable stadiums. 

Let’s look at the Washington Nationals. Twenty years ago when MLB relocated the Montreal Expos after 2004 season, the leagues search committee first priority was to find a community that would use public funding (mainly through bond debts) to fund a new stadium.  In Washington’s case, this amounted to over $600million in revenue bonds by the District of Columbia government. 

Step Two was to identify potential ownership groups to bid on the price of the team. The District government was not included for consideration as a member of — partial stakeholder — any of the ownership groups vying for the team. IMHO, $600M seems like a significant share of the final asking price, maybe even the single biggest minority shareholder under the current group.

If “‘ horse racing is the sport of Kings,”‘ then these professional leagues are the sport of oligarchs.

But there’s a better way. Consider this the “public option” for pro sports (see the national health care debate).

The Green Bay Packers operate under a unique business model in professional sports, known as community ownership. Unlike most teams owned by wealthy individuals or corporations, the Packers are owned by shareholders, who are fans of the team. However, these shares do not appreciate in value, pay dividends, or provide any other financial benefit. Instead, they grant voting rights, which allow shareholders to participate in electing a board of directors who oversee team operations. This model ensures community involvement and support, as well as financial stability for the franchise. The Packers have sold shares on several occasions to raise funds for stadium improvements and other expenses, but these shares cannot be traded on any established market.

However, leagues like the NFL have ownership rules make it difficult for community-owned teams to operate within the league.

According to NFL rules, a team’s principal owner must own at least 30% of the team, and that individual or entity must have control over the team’s operations. Additionally, there are restrictions on the number of owners and the types of entities that can own a team. These rules effectively limit the possibility of community ownership within the NFL, as it would be challenging for a large group of shareholders to meet these requirements and operate the team effectively.

While the Green Bay Packers are an exception to this rule due to their grandfathered status (they were established before the NFL’s current ownership rules), it would be difficult for a new team to adopt a community ownership model and gain entry into the NFL under the current regulations.

Further research suggestion -From ChatGPT–

… to locate case studies on the Green Bay Packers, especially with respect to their unique community-owned structure, you can consider the following strategies:

1. **University Libraries**: Certain universities with prominent sports management programs may have developed case studies on the Green Bay Packers. You can reach out to these institutions, like Northwestern’s Kellogg School of Management or Columbia’s Sports Management program, to inquire about access to their resources.

2. **Harvard Business Publishing**: This publisher offers a vast collection of business case studies and might have covered the Packers. Their catalog is searchable, and purchasing is straightforward for educators and students.

3. **Sports Business Journals**: These publications often conduct in-depth analyses that are case-study-like in their content and are more publicly accessible.

4. **National Football League (NFL) Resources**: The NFL has research and business analysis departments that might provide internal case studies or business analysis documents, some of which could potentially cover the Green Bay Packers.

5. **Google Scholar**: This free search engine for scholarly literature can sometimes yield results in the form of theses, dissertations, or research papers that act as in-depth case studies.

6. **Business School Associations**: Groups such as the AACSB (Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business) may have directories or listings of case studies that could lead you to one specific to the Packers.

7. **Professional Networking**: LinkedIn and academic networking sites can be useful. Connect with professionals who specialize in sports management or educators who teach related courses; they might be able to point you in the direction of relevant case study material or even provide copies if they have the rights to do so.

When searching, consider using terms like “Green Bay Packers organizational structure”, “Green Bay Packers business model”, “Green Bay Packers community ownership”, or “NFL team ownership case study” to refine your searches.